🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.