🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a increasing group of countries are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that phones and apps are "taking away our kids' innocence". The policy may be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked parliament to pass a law raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for minors without guardian approval is provided. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these services, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a useful first step," said one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. An organization founded by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing harmful online content contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," said a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, regulation is primarily happening at the state level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various politicians to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve user protection.

Even as this international discussion continues, the steps of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that policymakers internationally are less and less prepared to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.